TORONTO—Foodies throughout the city are scrambling for their recipe books after a surprise delivery of an American delicacy landed on street corners in the early morning of September 28. The Onion, a distant, saltier relative of the herald, the bugle and the gazette, has never been cultivated in Canada. Although it is often unfairly associated with Gawker, another American delicacy that, according to a report in New York magazine, is harvested by indentured servants, the Onion is farmed in good conscience by white, liberally-educated men and women largely in their early-to-mid twenties.

“It’s just so exciting,” says Serin Thomas, master baker at the Daily Pain, a nose-to-tail pastry shop in Yorkville. She pulled a bundle of the Onion out of a newspaper box on her stoop Wednesday morning and started experimenting. “It could be sweet; it could be savoury—who knows? I put it in everything.” Thomas says the top sellers of the day were the seal liver and Onion tiramisu and the Shih-Tzu and Onion smoked meatballs.

Asked whether customers are squeamish to try the new star ingredient, Guido Alhambra, head chef of the Church-Wellesley restaurant, le Coq et la Phoque says, “Oh, no no no. Just tell them it’s not Canadian and they’ll eat anything up.” Alhambra says that while the locavore movement continues to sell a lot of books and really gross looking apples, most of our nourishment still comes from our neighbours to the south. “There’s only so much you can do with maple syrup,” Alhambra adds, “And does anybody really like Canadian bacon?”

The Onion is slated to land in Vancouver within the next year. Writer and sculptor Douglas Coupland says he can’t wait for the Onion to arrive in Vancouver so he can chew it up and regurgitate it for an installation piece.

But late Tuesday night, multiple restaurateurs simultaneously reported that customers were experiencing hallucinations after eating the Onion. Whole tables believed that members of the U.S. Congress had taken a group of children hostage in the Capitol rotunda and threatened to shoot them for ransom.

Contacted for comment, a representative of the Onion downplayed the incident, saying, “Oh right, the hallucinations. We get those all the time. Actually,” he added, “the whole thing’s a lot cooler if you just don’t try to distinguish fact from reality.” He went on to say, “One time, all 300 million of us took something really powerful and we all went out into the desert and hunted the devil for ten years. That was a trip.”



Posted on October 07, 2011

In response to a Government of Quebec report that suggested some journalists be given a professional title, The Canadian Association of Journalists (CAJ) released a statement arguing that the proposal would infringe upon the freedom of the press.  

The proposed legislation is designed to help the public distinguish between amateurs and those “serving the public interest” and to fight the impacts of decreased sales, advertising and other economic constraints. But the report has alarmed many in the field concerned about the classification of only some journalists as professional, the logistics of certification and the impact of government intervention on the integrity of the press.

The CAJ wrote in its statement that the proposed legislation would impact the right of the press to work free and unimpeded by government. “Government, no matter how noble its intensions, cannot help journalism under this proposal without subverting it,” writes Hugo Rodrigues, CAJ president. The association maintains that the public can and does distinguish good, “professional” journalists from the bad and that dividing and classifying would be a mistake.

Klaus Pohle, a professor of journalism at Carleton University, wrote in The Gazette that journalism is not a true profession and open access to the occupation is the way it ought to be. Calling the proposal “a licensing scheme by stealth,” Pohle says, “These ideas, if put into practice, would transform journalism from a classless endeavour into a hierarchal system that privileges some over others.”

The report raises more questions than it answers, especially for those of us who are new to journalism, who have no formal training or who have titles that may not equate with “professional journalist.” Who is a professional journalist? Is a blogger as much of a journalist as a copy editor, as a radio producer, as a city hall reporter, as a television anchor? Should journalists be treated differently and awarded greater rights than citizens?

And, most of all, do we really want our government answering these questions?

Posted on October 04, 2011
ARCHIVES
Summer 2013
STAY CONNECTED